Category Archives: Toys

Elemental Dice 1-5

I just received 5 new Elemental Dice. Only two of the new ones were metal (Sa,Ce) and three were embedded in resin (S, Mn, Hg). Here is a picture of the complete collection.

As you can see the Ce(rium) die has already started to deteriorate. It came like that, I am not the only one, and we will see about replacement shipments.

I added Ce and Sa to my density table:

Atomic
Weigth
ElementTextbook
Dens
(g/cm)
Weight
(g)
Actual
Density
(g/cm)
Quote
6C2.267.071.7376.37%
12Mg1.7387.021.7198.61%
13Al2.710.902.6698.56%
22Ti4.517.944.3897.33%
24Cr7.1927.776.7894.29%
26Fe7.87430.657.4895.03%
27Co8.934.508.4294.64%
28Ni8.935.398.6497.08%
29Cu8.9635.548.6896.84%
30Zi7.13324.445.9783.65%
39Y4.4717.244.2194.16%
40Zr6.4925.386.2095.47%
41Nb8.5733.488.1795.38%
42Mo10.240.089.7995.93%
45Rh14.434.288.3758.12%
46Pd11.934.048.3169.84%
47Ag10.4940.319.8493.82%
48Cd8.733.028.0692.66%
50Sn7.3129.067.0997.06%
56Ce6.7626.336.4395.09%
62Sa7.5229.327.1695.19%
64Gd7.930.617.4794.60%
74W19.376.2818.6296.49%
78Pt21.4534.258.3638.98%
79Au19.2534.528.4343.78%
82Pb11.2943.9210.7294.97%
83Bi9.7838.029.2894.91%

All dice have a lower wight than exptected. First, the edge are rounded and text and die-numbers are engraved or carved out of the metal cube so it is expected to not be 100%. Some dice are just plated, for obvious reasons (Rh,Pd,Pt,Au) so most part of those are probably Fe/Ni-something. I do not know what is up with Carbon, I suppose it is another form of pure carbon than Graphite.

Elemental Dice 1-4

Update 2022-08-09: I got a precision scale that gives me two decimals on the weight in grams. It turned out that my initial weights were rather good, essentially just rounding errors. Total weight of all 25 dice was 3.29 grams lower with the new scale, which gives an average error of ~0.12 grams, and the biggest error was 0.96g. When I obtain Elemental Dice 5 I will make a new post with more accurate weights.

I have received Elemental Dice 4, and will now make a post about all the 25 dice. I have previously posted about 1-3 and Silver. Lets start with a picture of all 25 (it is hard with light and reflections).

I have measured the density of all the dice on a kitchen scale with 1g precision.

EDAtomic WeightElementDens (g/cm)Dice Weight (g)Weight quoteActual Density (g/cm)Quote
46C2.2673.101.7175.62%
12Mg1.73874.031.7198.33%
13Al2.7114.072.6999.46%
22Ti4.5184.004.3997.66%
424Cr7.19283.896.8495.08%
26Fe7.874303.817.3293.02%
427Co8.9353.938.5496.01%
28Ni8.9353.938.5496.01%
29Cu8.96364.028.7998.09%
30Zi7.133253.506.1085.57%
439Y4.47173.804.1592.85%
440Zr6.49264.016.3597.81%
441Nb8.57333.858.0694.01%
442Mo10.2403.929.7795.74%
45Rh14.4352.438.5459.34%Plated
46Pd11.9352.948.5471.81%Plated
X47Ag10.49413.9110.0195.42%
448Cd8.7333.798.0692.61%
50Sn7.31293.977.0896.85%
464Gd7.9313.927.5795.80%
74W19.3773.9918.8097.40%
78Pt21.45341.598.3038.70%Plated
79Au19.25351.828.5444.39%Plated
482Pb11.29433.8110.5092.99%
83Bi9.78383.899.2894.86%

A “4” in the first column is that they are new for the Elemental Dice 4 series and not included in my previous article. Densities seem quite fine, most of them well above 90% (which means I have no imminent reason to think the dice are not what they say they are). Carbon (C) has a lower density than expected (for graphite) but Carbon is not a metal and it makes sense to me that manufacturing method affects the atomic configuration.

The box states “pure elements can change color over time as the result of long term air chemical reactions with the […] air”. I sorted them from darkest to lightest and took a picture:

10 dice, sorted by shade of grey

This is difficult. Pb is more blue/cold. Cr is very shiny. Gd & Y changes position depending on light and perspective. But it gives you a hint.

Fe, Co, Ni (26,27,28) are all magnetic, as is Gd. The plated dice are slightly magnetic due to the material in the core, not the plating.

Elemental Dice Silver vs Silver

I wrote a post about my Elemental Dice a little while ago and the Silver dice got an entire section for themselves. I had owned the plated one longer and it had been in the aluminium stand. This is what they used to look like:

Plated silver to the left, severely oxidized after months, solid silver to the right, somewhat oxidized.

So, my guess was that the aluminium stand did something bad to the silver.

Since then the solid silver has been standing in the “faux leather dice roll mat” (available in E.D.2) and the plated silver has been standing in the aluminium stand. Now, a month and a half later I found that if any of them had any miscoloration it was the solid one, on the 6th face, that had been exposed to the faux leather.

I washed them both carefully in warm water and manual dish washer (which typically is used for utensils of metal), and took a few photos (with my new TX-158 “microscope”):

Solid Silver
Plated Silver

What you can clearly see here is that the solid one is laser engraved leaving the letters matte. The plated one is plated after the laser engraving, so also the letters are shiny. You can see this with your eye if you just look at them so this is an easy way to tell them apart (you can also determine that the solid one is a bit heavier, but it is not so obvious when you have them in your hand).

I took another picture of both of them at the same time.

Solid silver to the left, plated to the right

You can very clearly see that the inside of the “g” shines on the plated one and is matte with the solid.

But I also now see that more things are different. The plated one has had a thin layer of silver added afterwards, and that silver seems to have attached in a naturally shiny (almost liquid) way. The solid die on the other hand seems to have been polished to be shiny, leaving a very fine brushed surface.

To the naked eye, they also do not look exactly the same. The solid one appears to be more grayish and the plated one more warm yellow and perhaps even more shiny. If this is a matter of different age (time in the poluted air), different surface structure, or slightly different silver alloys I can not tell. Also the solid one seems to be blackish on 6th face.

Here is a picture of the 6th face of both dice. The solid die, to the right, has some black stains, and I suppose that is silver oxide (left one has been 45 days in aluminium stand, right one has been 45 days on faux leather).

Plated silver to the left, solid silver to the right.

But for now, it seems I was wrong about the aluminium oxidizing silver. I washed them today and I will put them back as they were, solid on faux leather and plated in the aluminium stand.

Elemental Dice 1 – 3

There has been some Kickstarter projects under the name Elemental Dice. Backers get dice made of “pure” elements, well as pure as possible. When it comes to very valuable elements (like gold) the dice are just plated with pure gold.

The first 3 Elemental Dice projects contained 15 different elements:

I decided to weight them and present some stats:

Atomic
Number
ElementDensity
Real (g/cm)
Dice Weight (g)Density
Actual (g/cm)
Quote
12Mg1.73871.7198.33%
13Al2.7112.6999.46%
22Ti4.5184.3997.66%
26Fe7.874307.3293.02%
28Ni8.9358.5496.01%
29Cu8.96368.7998.09%
30Zi7.133256.1085.57%
45Rh14.4358.5459.34%Plated
46Pd11.9358.5471.81%Plated
47Ag10.494110.0195.42%
50Sn7.31297.0896.85%
74W19.37718.8097.40%
78Pt21.45348.3038.70%Plated
39Au19.25358.5444.39%Plated
83Bi9.78389.2894.86%

The side of the dice are 16mm. But there are cavities and roundings so their actual volume is slightly smaller.

The plated dice all weight 34-35g, and they probably have the same interior. Their weight is rather uninteresting.

When it comes to the “as pure as possible dice” most of them are more or less within the error margin of my 1g resolution scale. Iron (Fe) seems to be an alloy with something lighter and Zink (Zi) even more so.

As expected, Nickel (Ni) and Iron (Fe) seems to be magnetic.

Silver

2021-10-14: I wrote separate post about the two silver dice and questioned some of below conclusions.


Silver is a noble metal, but everyone who has owned silverware knows that it gets blackish after a while. After a while I had the feeling that my silver dice were the ones that had deteriorated the most since I received them. I happen to own silver dice: one solid and one that is just plated.

Today someone who should know told me: pure silver does not oxidize like that in air. I had a closer look at them, and decided to take a photo:

This has obviously been a gradual process. The one to the left is the oldest die and is plated. The left die actually is that much darker on its 6th face. Since they are next to each other you can see it is just not a light reflection phenomena. The dark corner on the right dice IS the left die being reflected though.

As you may be aware of, the 6th face is opposite to the AG-face. I have kept my Elemental Dice in the aluminium stands, with the 6th face downwards, in contact with the aluminium. As you can see on the 3rd face, the stain/oxidization is triangular, being larger on the side that has been more down in the aluminium stand. And on the 2nd face, you can see kind of a line where the dice has touched the aluminium.

I feel quite confident that there is a reaction between Al and Ag, and that the silver dice (or silver in general) should not be in contact with Aluminium at all.
Not so sure about this any more, see separate post liked above.

Also, the little “holes” in the left (non-solid) die have turned yellowish. I don’t think is an optical phenomena because it has not happend (yet) to the solid silver dice, and there is nothing yellowish about Pt, Pa, Rh.

I am considering to paint my Aluminium stands with clear nail polish. Any other ideas?

Cleaning it!

There is a very simple way of removing the tarnish: link. It just requires sodium bicarbonate and some aluminium foil. The result is amazing, and it is fun do to chemistry in your own kitchen! Basically the Aluminium metal is sacrificed (oxidized) to restore the Silver atoms from Silver Oxide (and perhaps Silver Sulphide) to metal form.

Wishlist

There is a new set of Elemental Dice 4 with 10 new dice coming. The most missed ones after that would be:

  • Gallium – with a melting point of 29C it poses some practical problems, but including a mold for it would be cool
  • Uranium (depleted) – export restrictions and perhaps someone clever can turn U238 into Pu239

Böhm Stirling Engine HB13

I got the finest Christmas gift imaginable: a Böhm Stirling Engine HB13. I will write a few things about it here.

Compared to a Steam Engine
I also own a Wilesco D10. Don’t know if you want to get a Stirling Engine or a Steam Engine?

The Steam Engine is more robust and less sensitive to friction. It is more powerful and can be used to power different toys and accessories.

The Stirling Engine is more clean, more silent, and requires less preparation and cleaning up. The Stirling engine feels more safe as there is much lower pressure involved, and no boiling water.

Building it
I got the build-it-yourself Bausatz. That was a good thing. The website indicates it takes about 2h to assemble. Well, if you are that fast you are really good, but it does not take so much longer. You need a set of torx drivers, and you need to not lose any parts (some parts are very small). If you dont see well, or your hand is not very stable, dont build it yourself.

The tricky part with building it was the little liquids, fluids and grease. My package came with SuperGlue for the Ball bearings – very well – I know how to use it and the package said super glue. Then there was some oil – you can add it later, dont worry while building. Finally there was something called “White ceramic grease” – I suggest you wait with that one too! First build and test drive – then add oil and grease if needed.

The good thing with building it yourself is that if you later feel like cleaning/lubricating/fixing it, you already know all the parts and taking it apart a little will not scare you.

Fuel and fire
The instructions tell you to use 96% ethanol – great if you can purchase it legally. I cant. However, there is denaturated alcohol available for sale – in Sweden it is called Rödsprit – and it works very well.

Now, I had some problems getting my Engine running in the beginning. I suspected friction, too much ceramic grease and too little ceramic grease. In fact, there was a slight draught/wind where I ran the machine and the flame did not heat the heating cylinder perfectly. So my first advice; protect the machine/fire with little boxes/walls to ensure the flame is completely still and effective.

You may need to heat the machine for up to a minute before it can pick up speed. Give it some time before you proceed with checking the friction.

Friction
The Stirling engine does not have much extra power and a little friction can make it fail. If you disconnect the Working Piston / Arbeitskolben you can manually carefully slowly move it up and down. This should be quite hard due to air pressure. If you remove it completely you can let the machine spin freely. It should be quite noiseless and spin easily. If you spin the wheels it should do 3-4 revolutions before coming to a halt (with the Working Piston in place you barely get one revolution). I applied a little oil to the Displace axle / Verdrängerachse as well as to the Crank Shaft (where the connecing rods connect to it).

The amount of Ceramic Grease required on the Working Piston is minimal. I first added enough when building it. I then added far to much when trying to make the machine run better. I finally removed almost all grease I could both from cylinder and piston to make it work again.

Improving it
I find it weird that there is absolutely no insulation between Heating Cylinder and Cooling Cylinder. After all, it is difference in temperature between these two cylinders that make the machine work. I tried to add a thin layer of something between the two cylinders – so far not with very good result. A thin piece of hobby plywood did not maintain pressure/vacuum, and the machine did not run at all. A thin piece of cardboard appeared to work – the machine quickly accelerated, but when reaching top speed it quickly slowed down, to accelerate again. It kept “oscillating” in this way until i shut it down. Perhaps the design has a natural top speed – after all, air is shuffled back and forth, and has to change temperature, and this might require some milliseconds per revolution. I now run the machine with a paper insulation about 0.2mm thick. It works very fine, dont know if it really improves anything though.

I also tried to cool down the cooling cylinder by spraying it with little water. This helps surpisingly little, and is not required. With proper fireing the heating cylinder remains much warmer than the cooling cylinder anyway.

Performance
My machine, when fueled by spirit (denaturated ethanol) runs faster and faster with time. First minutes about 500 rpm. Later above 1000 rpm, and sometimes I have been able to get it up to 2000rpm, after like 20-30 minutes of continous operation.

If I power it with a tea candle (remember, not allowed since it soothens the model) it runs between 400-500 rpm for a while (perhaps up to 10 minutes). After that it comes to a halt.

My conclusion is that the machine essentially runs better at high temperature, but that the tea candle does not produce enough heat to keep the temperature difference up at high temperatures.

Measuring RPM
How do I measure RPM of my Stirling Engine? A device that listens to audio and measures RPM is called “Acoustic Tachometer”. I tried to find one for my iOS device and for my Symbian device with no success (however, there is supposed to be an app for Android simply called RPM).

I ended up programming my own Acoustic Tachometer. It runs in Linux and listens to /dev/dsp, and tells the RPM. It works, but not perfectly. The output has to be interpreted. I may improve it and/or share it some day. Feel free to comment if you are interested – I am happy to share my source code. But I guess the number of people who have a Stirling Engine AND compiles their own linux-binaries is quite small. I’d like to write an iOS version though, but my algorithm has to be better first.

Photographing a model backdrop

I decided my model train layout (Märklin Z) needed proper background image (a backdrop). If you google for it, you find many nice backdrops for sale. Those are probably fantastic, but I did not find one that works for me.

I will start with the result.

Backdrop

This is a panorama that is 180×15 cm, and most standard backdrops I found were not so extreme panoramas as I wanted. Also, when making it myself I could get the landscape I wanted.

Photographing
This is what you need:

  1. A location with unobstructed view over the horizon
  2. Good weather conditions, preferably the sun in your back
  3. A tripod

And of course, you need a camera. I made use of the following features of my Nikon P7000 when photographing my panorama.

  1. RAW mode (to ensure white balance etc are identical for all pictures)
  2. Delayed shutter or remote shutter (to keep camera absolutely still)
  3. Manual mode (you want the same shutter speed and aperture for each picture
  4. Grid 3×3 (to help with proper overlap
  5. Horizontal indicator (to help getting the horizon straight
  6. 200 mm equivalent zoom (to be able to take several pictures at a limited horizon stretch)

I only rotated the camera using the tripod between each picture, keeping the horizon exactly in the middle of the pictures, and I let the pictures overlap 1/3.

Essentially, the math goes like this. I wanted at least about 150-200 dpi for my final print of 180 cm. This requires a picture that is about 15000 pixels wide. Ideally I would use a camera with 15000×10000 pixel sensor (that is 150MPixels) and just crop the picture. I have no such camera, but my Nikon P7000 is about 3600 pixels wide. With an overlap of 1/3, it means each picture contributes with only 2400 pixels, so I need a series of about 6 pictures to get a 15000 pixels wide result. Now this is where telezoom comes into play. At 200mm, each picture is about 10 degrees. The more telezoom you can get, the shorter horizon you can work with.

Dont overexpose! You want the sky blue – not white. If you have UV filters and stuff – great. But I suggest you underexpose a bit.

Panorama stiching
I used Ubuntu and tools that come with it to create my panorama.

First I imported all my series into Shotwell. That means, I let Shotwell do the RAW developing, which turned out ok (all pictures had the same white balance, etc) – perhaps I was just lucky. I picked my best series, and exported all pictures from that series at highest quality.

Second, I used Hugin Panorama Creator to create the actual panorama. I choose Lens Type = Panoramic (Cylindrical). This is a lie (and at 200mm it is a small lie), but it created the completely straight horizon I wanted.

Finally, I did some cropping and color adjustments in Gimp.

Printing
How to print something that is 180×15 cm? My first idea was to print several standard 15×10 cm photos and just display them next to each other. Problem is, you never know if the crop your pictures a little bit, and in this case it would destroy the result completely.

I ended up (in Gimp), cutting my 15000 pixel panorama into 3 pieces (each 60x15cm), and pasting the 3 pieces to a 5600×4000 image. I left white margins around each piece.

I then sent my single big picture to print on standard photo paper in 70x50cm. I cut out the 3 pieces with a razor and mounted them next to each other.

Conclusions
I did not have so high expectations. My plan was to learn from my first attempt and do everything over again a few times. But my first result was really above expectations – and very much good enough for my purpose.

You do not need higher DPI than I had (15000 pixels for 180 cm). You can probably do with less.

I am very happy with my sky (~RGB=135,166,186) and the sea colors (~RGB=32,63,97).

Printing on normal photo paper was good – the result is nice. The edges between them are not perfect though.

Pulling your Märklin Z 86501

Isn’t it annoying? You just set up your new Märklin Z-layout, but the tracks are a little bit dirty, rusty or whatever, and the the trains stop all the time.

You bring out your item 86501 Gleisreinigungswagen, but it is too heavy to pull up your long 3% slopes. And it is not so practical to just go downhill.

This is what I did:

How to pull your 86501

Several advantages:

  • Double pulling power
  • If one engine loses electrical contact, the other one takes over
  • Looks good!

Hope you found this helpful!